Original article published
Tarnia Riggs LinkedIn in 2025:
linkedin.com/pulse/infrastructure-communications-engagement-beyond-concrete-tarnia
APM Project Management. Stakeholder Engagement in Project Management.
https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/stakeholder-engagement/
EnergyCo NSW – Renewable Energy Zones
https://www.energyco.nsw.gov.au/renewable-energy-zones
Engagement Australia (formerly IAP2 Australasia) – Community Engagement Resources
https://engagementinstitute.org.au/resources/
Infrastructure Australia – Infrastructure Market Capacity Report
https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/infrastructure-market-capacity-report
Infrastructure Australia – Social Infrastructure Framework
https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/social-infrastructure-framework
International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) – Social Impact Assessment Guidance
https://www.iaia.org/wiki-details.php?ID=23
Melbourne Water – Community Engagement and Major Projects
https://www.melbournewater.com.au/
NSW Government – Community Engagement Framework
https://www.nsw.gov.au/departments-and-agencies/communities-and-justice
Queensland Government – Stakeholder Engagement Toolkit
https://www.forgov.qld.gov.au/
Simply Stakeholders – Stakeholder Engagement Resources
https://simplystakeholders.com/
Social Pinpoint – Community Engagement Best Practice
https://www.socialpinpoint.com/community-engagement/
The World Bank – Environmental and Social Framework
https://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/environmental-and-social-framework
Urban Land Institute – Infrastructure and Community Development
https://uli.org/
Infrastructure projects are often measured by what is physically delivered — roads, rail, schools, transmission lines, pipelines, water infrastructure, or renewable energy assets. Yet after years working across infrastructure, energy, resources, education and government programs, one thing has become increasingly clear:
projects succeed or fail just as much through relationships, communication and trust as they do through engineering and construction.
Infrastructure may be physical, but its impact is deeply human.
Behind every major project are communities navigating disruption, businesses managing uncertainty, councils balancing competing expectations, political pressures, environmental concerns, operational constraints and stakeholders wanting to feel informed, respected and heard.
Over the years, I’ve worked across school upgrades, water infrastructure, renewable energy programs, resource projects and government initiatives, where communication and stakeholder engagement have become critical to social licence, reputation management and delivery success.
The projects varied in scale and complexity, the underlying lesson remained remarkably consistent:
People are far more likely to support disruption when they understand the purpose, feel respected throughout the process and trust the people delivering it.
One of the biggest misconceptions in infrastructure delivery is that stakeholder engagement sits on the fringe of projects.
It doesn’t.
Strong communications and engagement are risk management functions.
They help projects:
• reduce conflict and escalation
• identify emerging issues early
• protect reputation and social licence
• support delivery timelines
• improve transparency and accountability
• strengthen community relationships
• minimise misinformation and stakeholder fatigue
Projects increasingly operate within highly visible and politically sensitive environments where communities expect consultation, transparency and responsiveness.
Modern infrastructure delivery now requires organisations to navigate:
• community expectations
• ESG and sustainability considerations
• media scrutiny
• political sensitivity
• environmental impacts
• changing social expectations
• digital misinformation and online sentiment
• workforce pressures and delivery fatigue
The technical delivery of infrastructure is only one layer of project success. The social layer matters just as much.
Throughout my career, I’ve worked across projects including:
• Green Square Public School & Community Spaces
• Cronulla High School Upgrade
• Kogarah Public School Upgrade
• Northmead Public School & CAPA High School
• Dubbo South Public School
• Lennox Head Public School
• Leppington Public School
• Bathurst Public School
• EnergyCo NSW programs including Renewable Energy Zones and the Waratah Super Battery
• BHP Olympic Dam projects
• Melbourne Water infrastructure projects
• SA Health vaccination and emergency response programs
Each project involved completely different communities, stakeholder groups, sensitivities and delivery environments.
Some projects operated in highly urbanised environments with politically engaged communities.
Others involved regional communities where trust, visibility and local relationships carried far greater weight than polished presentations or newsletters.
The biggest lesson?
There is no universal engagement template.
Communities are not one-dimensional, and neither are stakeholders.
One of the most overlooked aspects of stakeholder engagement is physically understanding the project footprint.
Desktop mapping only tells part of the story.
Walking the alignment, visiting businesses, observing traffic movements, understanding school operations, speaking directly with residents and seeing how spaces are actually used often reveal risks and stakeholder impacts that reports and GIS mapping cannot.
You notice:
• access issues
• parking pressures
• noise sensitivities
• business visibility concerns
• pedestrian behaviours
• operational bottlenecks
• informal community gathering spaces
• emotional and historical connections to place
These observations fundamentally change how communication strategies should be developed.
Good engagement is grounded in reality, not assumptions.
Engagement is not simply relationship-building. It also requires systems, structure and consistency.
Pre-project success often hinges on:
• collecting accurate stakeholder data
• establishing consultation databases early
• tracking issues and interactions properly
• documenting commitments
• understanding sentiment trends
• maintaining continuity across project teams
Systems like Consultation Manager, stakeholder CRMs and engagement databases become critical operational tools on complex projects.
Projects are long.
Teams change.
Consultants rotate.
Contractors move on.
Without proper systems, corporate memory disappears, and stakeholders are forced to repeat concerns over and over again, which damages trust quickly.
Strong documentation and stakeholder tracking protect both the project team and the stakeholder experience.
Every project has stakeholders labelled as “difficult,” “anti-project”, or “challenging.”
In reality, these stakeholders often identify legitimate risks or overlooked impacts early.
Avoiding them rarely works.
Engaging them respectfully and consistently often leads to:
• better mitigation strategies
• improved transparency
• reduced escalation
• stronger project resilience
• fewer surprises later during construction
The projects that struggle most are often the ones where stakeholder issues were dismissed too early.
Conflict usually escalates when people feel ignored, blindsided or powerless.
One of the most valuable skills in infrastructure communications is the ability to translate technical information into language that stakeholders can actually understand.
You don’t need to be an engineer to work effectively in infrastructure communications, but you do need to become what I often jokingly call a “pretengineer.”
You need to understand:
• sequencing
• staging
• construction methodology
• technical risks
• operational impacts
• environmental constraints
• timelines and dependencies
That understanding allows communicators to:
• explain disruptions clearly
• anticipate stakeholder concerns
• manage expectations realistically
• reduce misinformation
• support decision-making
Stakeholders don’t need engineering jargon.
They need clarity.
Strong infrastructure communication is not about spin.
It is about translating complexity into trust.
One of the biggest mistakes organisations make is assuming infrastructure stories are boring.
They aren’t.
Every project impacts real people, places and communities.
Some of the most successful engagement outcomes I’ve seen involved creative storytelling approaches that connected projects to:
• local history
• community pride
• heritage
• environmental outcomes
• safety improvements
• future generations
• sustainability
• economic opportunity
On Melbourne Water projects, storytelling included:
• historical photography
• local business engagement
• postcards and visual collateral
• informal stakeholder conversations
• community-focused narratives explaining why works mattered
Even sewer infrastructure can become meaningful when framed around public health, environmental protection, resilience and long-term community benefit.
People connect with stories, not technical specifications.
One of the clearest examples of this occurred during emergency works in Williamstown.
Unexpected sewer works required immediate action directly outside a busy restaurant during peak trading hours.
Under different circumstances, this easily could have escalated into complaints, conflict or media attention.
Instead, because relationships and trust had already been built through regular communication and visible engagement, the conversation was constructive and cooperative.
That experience reinforced a simple but powerful lesson:
trust built early changes how stakeholders respond during difficult moments.
Projects cannot wait until disruption occurs before engaging communities.
Relationships need to be built long before problems emerge.
Social licence has become one of the defining challenges of modern infrastructure delivery.
Particularly across:
• renewable energy
• transmission infrastructure
• mining and resources
• transport infrastructure
• water and utilities
• urban development
Communities increasingly expect:
• transparency
• participation
• responsiveness
• accountability
• genuine consultation
Projects can no longer rely solely on regulatory approval to secure community acceptance.
Social licence is earned continuously through behaviour, communication and trust.
Strong stakeholder engagement is not:
• glossy newsletters
• consultation theatre
• one-way communication
• generic stakeholder lists
• reactive crisis management
Effective engagement is:
• visible
• proactive
• transparent
• adaptable
• consistent
• relationship-focused
• grounded in listening
It means understanding:
• who is impacted
• how they are impacted
• when they are impacted
• what matters to them
• how they prefer to communicate
No two communities are the same.
No two projects are the same.
After years of working across infrastructure, energy, education, government and resources, one thing remains constant:
The most successful projects are built on trust long before they are built on site.
Infrastructure communications and stakeholder engagement are not “soft skills.”
They are strategic delivery functions that directly influence project outcomes, reputation, community confidence and long-term success.
As infrastructure programs continue to accelerate across Australia and globally, the projects that will succeed are those that understand communities are not obstacles to manage — they are stakeholders to engage, respect, and bring along on the journey.
Infrastructure may begin with concrete and steel.
But its success will always remain deeply human.
-Industry commentary and insights written by Tarnia Riggs.
#Infrastructure #StakeholderEngagement #CommunityEngagement #StrategicCommunications #SocialImpact #InfrastructureProjects #ProjectManagement #EnergyTransition #StakeholderManagement #SocialLicence #ConstructionProjects #InfrastructureCommunications #ChangeManagement #PublicInfrastructure #CommunityRelations #CorporateAffairs #Sustainability #GovernmentProjects #RiskManagement #SocialImpactAssessment
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Manage your cookie preferences below:
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
Clarity is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Service URL: clarity.microsoft.com (opens in a new window)